Practice Areas

Steakley Law Firm

John A. Steakely

Attorney John Steakley is a 1996 graduate of the University of Tennessee College of Law. He began his career as the Special Prosecutor for Drug Crimes for a multi-county, multi-agency drug task force in Tennessee, where he represented the State of Tennessee in thousands of felony and misdemeanor cases in a 5-county judicial district.

  • Home
    Home This is where you can find all the blog posts throughout the site.
  • Categories
    Categories Displays a list of categories from this blog.
  • Tags
    Tags Displays a list of tags that has been used in the blog.
  • Bloggers
    Bloggers Search for your favorite blogger from this site.
  • Team Blogs
    Team Blogs Find your favorite team blogs here.
  • Login

Fifty Years Later, And It Still Doesn't Work

Posted by on in Criminal Defense Blog
  • Font size: Larger Smaller
  • Hits: 3949
  • Subscribe to this entry
  • Print

A full half-century after the Gideon v. Wainright decision from the U.S. Supreme Court holding that indigent people accused of crimes are entitled to taxpayer-funded attorneys for their defense, the system still isn't working, says the American Bar Association.  Clarence Earl Gideon was a homeless drifter in his 50's accused of breaking into a pool hall.  He was convicted without an attorney and sent to prison.  He appealed. 

In its Gideon decision, the justices unanimously overruled a 1942 case, Betts v. Brady, and held that the Sixth Amendment’s guarantee of counsel was a fundamental right made applicable to the states through the 14th Amendment. Justice Hugo L. Black wrote for the court that it was an “obvious truth” that a fair trial for an indigent defendant could not be guaranteed without the assistance of counsel. The “noble ideal” that every defendant “stands equal before the law … cannot be realized if the poor man charged with crime has to face his accusers without a lawyer to assist him,” Black wrote.

It always sounds wonderful when people promise other people stuff for free.  It is the foundation of modern politics.  The problem, though, is that it rarely works: 

A year ago, addressing the American Bar Association’s National Summit on Indigent Defense, U.S. Attorney General Eric H. Holder Jr. said that across the country, “public defender offices and other indigent defense providers are underfunded and understaffed. Too often, when legal representation is available to the poor, it’s rendered less effective by insufficient resources, overwhelming caseloads and inadequate oversight.”

In short, Holder said, “the basic rights guaranteed under Gideon have yet to be fully realized.”

There you have it: United States Attorney General Eric Holder speaking fast and furiously about how people who rely on public defenders get a level of service that is "less effective" because of "insufficient resources, overwhelming caseloads and inadequate oversight."  But Holder isn't the only person who knows it: 

Daniel T. Goyette, the chief public defender for Jefferson County in Kentucky, and a member of the ABA’s Standing Committee on Legal Aid and Indigent Defendants, says that “despite some genuine efforts and notable advances, the criminal justice system and, more pointedly, the leadership of our executive, legislative and judicial branches of government—both state and federal —have largely failed to carry out the constitutional mandate of the Gideon decision.”

He adds: “Sadly, it has not been a priority, and we are constantly taking one step forward and two steps back.”

This isn't a new problem:

A 2004 report by the ABA, Gideon’s Broken Promise: America’s Continuing Quest for Equal Justice (PDF), laid out the top concerns. The chief one is that indigent defense services are not adequately funded, leading to an inability to attract and compensate good lawyers, as well as to pay for experts and investigators. Meanwhile, defenders of the indigent are often inexperienced, fail to maintain proper contact with their clients, or are not competent to provide services that meet ethical standards. And judges sometimes fail to honor the independence of defense counsel and routinely accept representation of indigent defendants that is patently inadequate.

That report shouldn't have shocked anyone, because public opinion polls from years earlier already showed that Most Would Not Trust A Public Defender.  But that was in 2004.  Surely the problem was solved, right?  Think again:

Fast-forward to 2009, and a report of the National Right to Counsel Committee and the Constitution Project found little progress. Despite an overall increase in funding, “inadequate financial support continues to be the single greatest obstacle to delivering ‘competent’ and ‘diligent’ defense representation,” said the report, Justice Denied: America’s Continuing Neglect of Our Constitutional Right to Counsel (PDF).

The most visible sign of such inadequate funding is public defenders with “astonishingly large caseloads,” sometimes more than 100 clients per lawyer at a time. Such lawyers cannot interview their clients properly, file the appropriate motions, investigate their cases, responsibly negotiate with prosecutors, or perform other tasks.

Never a group to pass up a chance at publicity, the ACLU has their own project outlining the failings of the public defender system in their "Unfulfilled at 50" project.

The real goal of all this public criticism is to generate more money from politicians for public defenders, but I think this theme that "public defenders don't do a good job because they don't get enough taxpayer dollars" does more harm than good, because it also means that until there is a vast increase in taxpayer dollars for attorneys to defend the accused, public defenders will continue to do a poor job. 

In Georgia, most counties are part of the statewide public defender system.  A few places, like Gwinnett County, Cobb County, Cherokee County and a few others fund their own systems that are independent of the statewide system.  I think clients get more attention in the independent systems, but those systems and the lawyers who work within them are still economically limited in what they can do for their clients.  Even in those counties, my advice to someone facing criminal charges would still be to hire your own attorney. 

With the United States Attorney General, the National Right to Counsel Committee, the American Civil Liberties Union, and the American Bar Association all going on record describing public defenders as underfunded, understaffed,  less effective, having insufficient resources, overwhelming caseloads and inadequate oversight, the answer to the question of Should I Hire A Criminal Defense Attorney? should be more crystal clear than ever:  YES

UPDATE: This isn't a slap at the dedication of the individual lawyers who work in PD offices.  This is a criticism of the highest levels who use these overworked lawyers as hostages to extort more money from taxpayers instead of advocating for stricter limits on who qualifies for a PD. 


Fifty Years After Gideon v. Wainwright . . .

Despite the "True Believers," The Public Defender System is Broken

Should I Hire A Defense Attorney?

Most Would Not Trust A Public Defender

Attorney General Holder's Remarks on Indigent Defense

The Right to Counsel: An Unfulfilled Constitutional Right

Failing Gideon: An Indigent Defense System In Crisis

Gideon at Fifty: A Problem of Political Will


Don't miss a single post! To be alerted when a new blog post appears (about every other day or so), click on "Subscribe to Blog" near the top of this page.



Attorney John Steakley is a 1996 graduate of the University of Tennessee College of Law. He began his career as the Special Prosecutor for Drug Crimes for a multi-county, multi-agency drug task force in Tennessee, where he represented the State of Tennessee in thousands of felony and misdemeanor cases in a 5-county judicial district.

He was selected by the National College of District Attorneys to attend advanced legal seminars in Santa Fe, New Orleans, San Francisco, and Houston. In 2000, he was appointed to the position of Special Assistant United States Attorney for the Eastern District of Tennessee by Attorney General Janet Reno, and reappointed again the following year.

In 2001, he accepted an offer from the Gwinnett County District Attorneys Office and spent the next four years representing the State of Georgia in several hundred serious felony cases.   He continues to handle the most serious of cases, often winning outright dismissals of charges, or significant reductions for his clients.  For more about the type of cases Mr. Steakley has handled, click here:  Selected Criminal Cases

SteakleyCh5336x280In 2006 he was a founding partner of Crosby, Haldi & Steakley, LLC, located in Decatur.  Now in private practice since 2007 as John A. Steakley, P.C., headquartered in Marietta, he represents individuals in a wide variety of matters, using his experience to provide his clients with quality legal representation. He is licensed to practice law in both Tennessee and Georgia, but focuses almost solely on Georgia.  

In 2012, the Georgia Supreme Court certified him as a Mentor for theTransition Into Law Practice Program, serving as a role model and mentoring young attorneys just entering into the practice of law.  This came on the heels of years of coaching the Emory University Law School's Mock Trial Team in how to be effective and successful courtroom litigators.

In addition to advocating for his clients in the courtroom, Mr. Steakley is a strong proponent of individual liberties.  He co-authored a scholarly work on whether the United States Constitution afforded citizens the right to record their interactions with police even in private places.  This article has garnered attention and raised awareness about this timely legal-technology issue, and was named one of the "Must Read Articles of 2012" by the National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers. 

He is a member of the Tennessee Bar Association, the Tennessee Supreme Court, the Tennessee Court of Criminal Appeals, the Tennessee Court of Civil Appeals, the State Bar of Georgia, the Georgia Supreme Court, the Georgia Court of Appeals, Georgia Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers, National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers, Gwinnett County Bar Association, and Cobb County Bar Association.

When not practicing law, Mr. Steakley is an instrument-rated private pilot who enjoys flying around the Southeast.  He has been a pilot since 1999.


Make a Payment

We accept most major credit cards.


PayPal Acceptance Mark

Contact Us

540 Powder Springs Street
Suite D-22
Marietta, GA 30064

You are here: Home Blogs Criminal Defense Blog John A Steakley Fifty Years Later, And It Still Doesn't Work